The French Declare the Right to Disconnect from the Office

A recent French law gives workers the right to disconnect from their digital devices when off-work. This is an intriguing idea that other industrialized nations should consider imitating.

Some advocates cite the constant potential of immediate work obligations as contributing to greater levels of anxiety and burnout among modern workers. I can speak from personal experience about the alarm one feels upon receiving an urgent work-related e-mail at 7:15 in the evening. Plans have to be changed, and the few hours of free time at the end of the day are forfeited. 

Continue reading The French Declare the Right to Disconnect from the Office

What the Reforms of the Industrial Age Can Teach Us About the Challenges of the Digital Age

In an interview published in Real Clear Future, Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) compared the digital revolution to the industrial revolution. This thought experiment caught my attention, because I have given considerable thought to that exact same comparison. I disagree with Senator Sasse on many political matters, but this son of rural Nebraska who earned a U.S. history Ph.D. from Yale certainly has one of the keenest minds and one of the most unique perspectives of any current American politician.

Sasse views the current digital revolution as one of the four fundamental stages in human societal evolution throughout history: “You have hunter-gatherers, you have the rise of agriculture, and then you had the rise of the big tool economy: industrialization, urbanization, mass immigration both across the seas and most fundamentally from the American countryside to cities, as you go from about 86 percent of the public working on the farm at the end of the Civil War to almost 60 percent of the public working in big cities by World War II. And then now this new thing, the digital economy, the mobile economy, the knowledge economy, the service economy—the post-industrial economy, fundamentally.” He argues that “Industrialization is the only real analog for this moment.”

How does the trajectory of the digital revolution resemble the industrial revolution? Well, like the Erie Canal and the transcontinental railroads (which received government funding), the Internet started with public subsidization (the government-funded ARPANET project), but later became a chaotic private economic competition that was sometimes bad for workers and consumers, and then veered toward monopolies that carried their own problems and risks. The resulting centralization of power and money allowed the corporate winners of this competition to become a class of “robber-barons” who spent their money to influence the American political system. We may be seeing similar developments today, as tech companies try to avoid regulation and attempt to influence the boundaries of public debate in their own self-interest.

Continue reading What the Reforms of the Industrial Age Can Teach Us About the Challenges of the Digital Age

Tech Giants Should Reconsider Their Role in Shaping Our Economic Future

“If you can access a service for free, or for a remarkably low price, you yourself might be the product.” That line, in an article called “Should the Tech Giants Reprogram Capitalism?” by Nicholas Barrett of The Economist, sent a chill down my spine.

Our physical bodies are not products, of course (thankfully). Our online activities are the product. Tech companies sell information about us to advertisers. By enabling those advertisers to pitch their products to us on sites that they know we frequent, tech companies sell our attention spans.

Continue reading Tech Giants Should Reconsider Their Role in Shaping Our Economic Future

I Did Absolutely Nothing But Write About “Office Space,” and It Was Everything I Thought It Could Be

The 1999 film “Office Space” remains a cult classic. It’s one of my personal favorite comedies of all time, and it’s one of the most iconic movies about the experience of working in the tech industry. However, much of the angst that it so hilariously documents is a feature of much of white-collar work in general rather than software companies in specific.

Continue reading I Did Absolutely Nothing But Write About “Office Space,” and It Was Everything I Thought It Could Be

Official Unemployment Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story

It’s great to see that some tech companies are creating lots of new jobs. Long lines of people showed up and waited hours to apply when Amazon announced thousands of warehouse jobs. Business Insider’s Pedro Nicolaci da Costa notes that these throngs of job-seekers might surprise economists who see unemployment and underemployment as minor issues, given the current low official unemployment numbers.

However, a few charts complicate the seemingly rosy labor market picture. Above all, data indicates that the U.S. economy still has not fully recovered from the Great Recession. Wage growth has remained mostly flat since the Great Recession, and the numbers have only gone down since the inauguration of the new president in January. See this chart based on Bureau of Labor Statistics Data:

Continue reading Official Unemployment Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story

Should Next US President be a Supercomputer?

There is a lot of hype right now about the mechanization of the workplace and the extent to which human jobs will be replaced by machines. At the extreme end of the spectrum is Artificial Intelligence, and machines that (even if not self-aware) will be intelligent and insightful enough to make decisions and take initiative rather than relying on programmers to give them precise instructions.

It may reflect the professional-class bias of our news media that there seems to be a lot more attention and concern over this issue now that white-collar jobs, in addition to blue-collar jobs, are potentially threatened by new technology. LegalZoom has created anxiety among lawyers that mass-online lawyering operations will put small firms and solo practitioners out of business. Mass-produced online lectures threaten teachers and professors in academia.

Now a provocative article by Michael Linhorst in Politico reveals that some tech-utopians believe that even the most high-profile white-collar executive position in the world, the United States President, could be replaced and improved by computer technology. Linhorst describes the proponents’ ideal as a superhuman supercomputer: “The president would more likely be a computer in a closet somewhere, chugging away at solving our country’s toughest problems. Unlike a human, a robot could take into account vast amounts of data about the possible outcomes of a particular policy. It could foresee pitfalls that would escape a human mind and weigh the options more reliably than any person could—without individual impulses or biases coming into play. We could wind up with an executive branch that works harder, is more efficient and responds better to our needs than any we’ve ever seen.”

Continue reading Should Next US President be a Supercomputer?